hotstuff_rs/hotstuff/roles.rs
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206
/*
Copyright © 2023, ParallelChain Lab
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*/
//! Functions that determine what roles a replica should play at any given View and Validator Set State.
use ed25519_dalek::VerifyingKey;
use crate::{
pacemaker::protocol::select_leader,
types::{data_types::ViewNumber, validator_set::ValidatorSetState},
};
use super::{
messages::{NewView, PhaseVote},
types::{Phase, PhaseCertificate},
};
/// Determine whether the `replica` is an "active" validator, given the current `validator_set_state`.
///
/// An active validator can:
/// - Propose/Nudge and phase vote in the HotStuff protocol,
/// - Contribute [timeout votes](crate::pacemaker::messages::TimeoutVote) and
/// [advance view messages](crate::pacemaker::messages::AdvanceView).
///
/// ## `is_validator` logic
///
/// Whether or not `replica` is an active validator given the current `validator_set_state` depends on
/// two factors:
/// 1. Whether `replica` is part of the Committed Validator Set (CVS), the Previous Validator Set (PVS),
/// both validator sets, or neither.
/// 2. Whether `validator_set_state.update_decided()` or not.
///
/// The below table specifies exactly the return value of `is_validator` in every possible combination
/// of the two factors:
///
/// ||Validator Set Update Decided|Validator Set Update Not Decided|
/// |---|---|---|
/// |Part of CVS (and maybe also PVS)|`true`|`true`|
/// |Part of PVS only|`false`|`true`|
/// |Part of neither neither CVS or PVS|`false`|`false`|
pub(crate) fn is_validator(
replica: &VerifyingKey,
validator_set_state: &ValidatorSetState,
) -> bool {
validator_set_state
.committed_validator_set()
.contains(replica)
|| (!validator_set_state.update_decided()
&& validator_set_state
.previous_validator_set()
.contains(replica))
}
/// Determine whether `validator` should act as a proposer in the given `view`, given the current
/// `validator_set_state`.
///
/// ## `is_proposer` Logic
///
/// Whether or not `validator` is a proposer in `view` depends on two factors:
/// 1. Whether or not `validator` is the [leader](select_leader) in either the CVS or the PVS in
/// `view` (it could possibly be in both), and
/// 2. Whether or not `validator_set_update.update_decided`.
///
/// The below table specifies exactly the return value of `is_proposer` in every possible combination
/// of the two factors:
///
/// ||Validator Set Update Decided|Validator Set Update Not Decided|
/// |---|---|---|
/// |Leader in CVS (and maybe also PVS)|`true`|`true`|
/// |Leader in PVS only|`false`|`true`|
/// |Leader in neither CVS or PVS|`false`|`false`|
pub(crate) fn is_proposer(
validator: &VerifyingKey,
view: ViewNumber,
validator_set_state: &ValidatorSetState,
) -> bool {
validator == &select_leader(view, validator_set_state.committed_validator_set())
|| (!validator_set_state.update_decided()
&& validator == &select_leader(view, validator_set_state.previous_validator_set()))
}
/// Determine whether or not `replica` should phase-vote for the `Proposal` or `Nudge` that `justify`
/// was taken from. This depends on whether `replica`'s `PhaseVote`s can become part of quorum
/// certificates that directly extend `justify`.
///
/// If this predicate evaluates to `false`, then it is fruitless to vote for the `Proposal` or `Nudge`
/// that `justify` was taken from, since according to the protocol, the next leader will ignore the
/// replica's phase votes anyway.
///
/// ## `is_phase_voter` Logic
///
/// `replica`'s phase vote can become part of PCs that directly extend `justify` if-and-only-if
/// `replica` is part of the appropriate validator set in the `validator_set_state`, which is either the
/// Committed Validator Set (CVS), or the Previous Validator Set (PVS). In turn, which of CVS and PVS is
/// the appropriate validator set depends on two factors:
/// 1. Whether or not `validator_set_update.update_decided()`, and
/// 2. What `justify.phase` is:
///
/// The below table specifies which validator set `replica` must be in order to be a voter in every
/// possible combination of the two factors:
///
/// ||Validator Set Update Decided|Validator Set Update Not Decided|
/// |---|---|---|
/// |Phase == `Generic`, `Prepare`, `Precommit`, or `Decide`|CVS|PVS|
/// |Phase == `Commit`|CVS|CVS|
///
/// ## Preconditions
///
/// `justify` satisfies [`safe_pc`](crate::block_tree::invariants::safe_pc) and
/// [`is_correct`](crate::types::signed_messages::Certificate::is_correct), and the block tree updates
/// associated with this `justify` have already been applied.
pub(crate) fn is_phase_voter(
replica: &VerifyingKey,
validator_set_state: &ValidatorSetState,
justify: &PhaseCertificate,
) -> bool {
if validator_set_state.update_decided() {
validator_set_state
.committed_validator_set()
.contains(&replica)
} else {
match justify.phase {
Phase::Generic | Phase::Prepare | Phase::Precommit | Phase::Decide => {
validator_set_state
.previous_validator_set()
.contains(&replica)
}
Phase::Commit => validator_set_state
.committed_validator_set()
.contains(&replica),
}
}
}
/// Identify the leader that `phase_vote` should be sent to, given the current `validator_set_state`.
///
/// ## `phase_vote_recipient` Logic
///
/// The leader that `phase_vote` should be sent to is the leader of `phase_vote.view + 1` in the appropriate
/// validator set in `validator_set_state`, which is either the committed validator set (CVS) or the
/// previous validator set (PVS). Which of the CVS and the PVS is the appropriate validator set depends
/// on two factors: 1. Whether or not `validator_set_update.update_decided`, and 2. What `justify.phase`
/// is:
///
/// ||Validator Set Update Decided|Validator Set Update Not Decided|
/// |---|---|---|
/// |Phase == `Generic`, `Prepare`, `Precommit`, or `Commit`|CVS|PVS|
/// |Phase == `Decide`|CVS|CVS|
pub(crate) fn phase_vote_recipient(
phase_vote: &PhaseVote,
validator_set_state: &ValidatorSetState,
) -> VerifyingKey {
if validator_set_state.update_decided() {
select_leader(
phase_vote.view + 1,
validator_set_state.committed_validator_set(),
)
} else {
match phase_vote.phase {
Phase::Generic | Phase::Prepare | Phase::Precommit | Phase::Commit => select_leader(
phase_vote.view + 1,
validator_set_state.previous_validator_set(),
),
Phase::Decide => select_leader(
phase_vote.view + 1,
validator_set_state.committed_validator_set(),
),
}
}
}
/// Identify the leader(s) that `new_view` should be sent to, given the current `validator_set_state`.
///
/// ## `new_view_recipients` Logic
///
/// Upon exiting a view, a replica should send a `new_view` message to the leader of `new_view.view + 1`
/// in the committed validator set (CVS), *and*, if `!validator_set_state.update_decided` (not decided),
/// *also* to the leader of the same view in the previous validator set (PVS).
///
/// ## Return value
///
/// Returns a pair containing the following items:
/// 1. `VerifyingKey`: the leader in the committed validator set in `new_view.view + 1`.
/// 2. `Option<VerifyingKey>`: the leader in the resigning validator set in `new_view.view + 1` (`None`
/// if the most recently initiated validator set update has been decided).
pub(crate) fn new_view_recipients(
new_view: &NewView,
validator_set_state: &ValidatorSetState,
) -> (VerifyingKey, Option<VerifyingKey>) {
(
select_leader(
new_view.view + 1,
validator_set_state.committed_validator_set(),
),
if validator_set_state.update_decided() {
None
} else {
Some(select_leader(
new_view.view + 1,
validator_set_state.previous_validator_set(),
))
},
)
}